 kballinas
|
I’m planning to use a JSGF, and while reading the specifications for JSGF I came across “tags”.
http://java.sun.com/products/java-media/speech/forDevelopers/JSGF/JSGF.html#15057
It says that “tags are attached to the result object returned by the recognizer to an application”, and I was wondering if this is true when using OpenEars.
This functionality would be greatly helpful in my application (it would reduce the number of service calls from a maximum of 36 to exactly 1 every time).
I found a similar question in another post, but it was never answered. http://www.politepix.com/forums/topic/support-for-jsgf-in-openears/
|
 Halle
|
Hello,
OpenEars just uses Pocketsphinx’s JSGF support, so if there are questions about details of JSGF implementation, the most definitive place to ask is the CMU Sphinx forum. I support JSGF but it isn’t really part of my testbed so I’m limited in how much I can tell you about Pocketsphinx’s implementation.
|
 Joseph S. Wisniewski
|
According to the Sphinx team, this was supposed to be in the 0.7 release last year, but it wasn’t.
http://cmusphinx.sourceforge.net/wiki/releaseschedule
Right now, the JSGF has these limitations.
* No semantic or attribute tags
* No include files
* One public grammar per file
* Poor recognition performance and speed, due to some major bugs that cause the FSG that Sphinx generates from the JSGF to be anywhere from 4-10 times as large as it should be.
There also was supposed to be a Pocketsphinx 0.8 at the end of August, 2010.
Not sure why they ended up behind schedule, but all sorts of things can happen in a mostly academic-funded free software project. They do pretty well with teh resources at hand.
|
 kballinas
|
Thanks to the both of you, and that’s what I guessed. oh well, I’ll have to see what I can do on my own.
|